Trust vs Control: Is control merely a substitute for trust?

I received this quote in an invitation to a fraud workshop today [the theme of the workshop: "The real secret to fraud deterrence"]:

“If you were to ask a group of typical accountants what deters fraud, they would respond in unison: “Internal control!” Using this logic, companies with internal controls would not have fraud. But they do – time and again.” – Joe Wells, founder of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.

This sounds a bit like a boring accounting/auditing issue, but it’s actually crucially important to each one of us in every sphere in which we interact!

Why do I say this?

Simple – controls are nothing more than a substitute for trust.

If trust is absolute, controls are unnecessary. But increasingly trust is taking a back seat to controls as the business environment becomes more fluid and absolutes go out the window, giving less certainty to any and all dealings.

How do you gain trust? Only by giving it. And that’s where the problem starts, isn’t it… can you trust me before I trust you? Hmmm? So perhaps control is just the easier option then? 

Consider these examples (in nature’s formula of cause and effect, I’m not sure which these qualify under, but they’re substantial problems nonetheless):

  • Employment – People used to remain in the same job for their entire career and had implicit trust in their employers [and employers therefore were able to trust their employees]. Now jobs change faster than Madonna’s outfits, and employee motivation and retention are key issues for every company.
  • Business relationships – Contracts have become the be-all and end-all. Gentlemen’s agreements, handshakes and good faith are all endangered species.
  • Regulation – Regulation is increasing so much so that all aspects of life are subject to scrutiny in some form or other. It used to be high-level matters like tax affairs and criminal records, but now the level of detail being extracted from us borders on obscene, simply because the best way to maintain control is to know everything.

The way I see it, if you can’t trust someone, why do you want to do business with them in the first place? Or work for them? Or employ them? Or whatever…

Sadly, “good faith” is really difficult to find nowadays. In fact, it’s rather ironic if you consider the real value that people place on relationships [built on trust, presumably].

Anyway, please let me know what you think – is there a place for trust in business today, or is control the way to go? How would you run your business? [When it's tiny? And when it's huge?]

Share this post: Share this post with the world.
  • Muti
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Other posts you might enjoy

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Email this post to a friend Email this post to a friend

This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 27th, 2008 at 1:49 pm and is filed under Entrepreneurship, Strategies and Tools. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  • Gopi Padakandla Says:
    September 7th, 2008 at 6:09 pm

    Great blog Darren and congratulations on embarking Top 10 Carnival of Trust.
    I agree with your point. With the difficult economy driving the urgent need to bring out the best in people (with trust) and reduce the cost (of controls and fraud), there is no better time than now for organizations to start developing culture of trust and transparency.

    I would have to agree with this comment, its amazing to see what people are capable of dong under these types of circumstances.
  • Darren
    Hi Jimmy. I don't know if it became more important after Enron - I think it was always as important, but the perception of its' importance improved dramatically after that.

    Looking at how it was addressed though, with Sarbanes Oxley and other similar control measures, I think they took it to the wrong extreme, and now business is suffering the consequence of too much legislation trying to make sure it doesn't happen again... and ironically this will probably cause it to happen sooner.

    It's true what you say - people go to extreme measures when the situation sours. Such a pity.
  • I agree. Ever since Enron, trust has become so much more important. When things get sour, many people turn to lying and cheating and betraying your trust, as opposed to working with you to achieve a bigger goal.
  • Darren
    Thanks Gopi, also appreciate your link from your blog... interesting context that you used it in there.

    Brad, thanks for the positive comment! As you and I write this, the world is going somewhere it has never been before, with talk of a global meltdown. I have now put in an order for my own detector, but in the meantime will still be relying more on trust as far as possible. But you're very right - it poses a huge challenge to future leaders, and it's one of the most important ones we must get right.
  • Hi Darren. Your post is a very thought provoking one. Thanks. When one looks at how wall street and other high flying derivatives traders and ceos around the world are abusing their positions of trust, its easy to see how controls need to be tightened. Its very easy to become the most guarded and tight-A*** control freak, but where and how do we draw the line? Trust is such a fragile thing, and once its broken - hmmm. I like Charles suggestion that a lot of the controls are unnecessary clutter. But its a sign of the times. When our own leaders fail us in business and government, the FUD - fear, uncertainty and doubt - ripple through companies - resulting in new procedures, additions and amendments to contracts etc. Ultimately as future leaders, we need to try and stand back from the 'dust cloud', and engage and train our intuition more. This aspect of ourselves lies at the other end of our 'how to survival' continuum. My finance and accounting Prof would often refer to it as his personal 'Crap Detector'. When it bleeps - we need to listen to it - regardless of the contracts and fine print.
  • Great blog Darren and congratulations on embarking Top 10 Carnival of Trust.
    I agree with your point. With the difficult economy driving the urgent need to bring out the best in people (with trust) and reduce the cost (of controls and fraud), there is no better time than now for organizations to start developing culture of trust and transparency.
  • Charles, thanks for bringing this to my attention and for your great comments!

    I like your take on the legal/accounting costs being the price we pay for low trust - it would be interesting to see how businesses stack when measured in this way.

    Personally I agree with you that a lot of this control is not necessary, but I believe many would disagree, hence our current undesirable circumstances. Sad really.

    Red tape has brought many aspiring entrepreneurs to their knees, and probably robs many businesses (and countries) of opportunities they could barely imagine. Only once businesses and governments start realising this will they tap the amazing potential sitting inside each one of them.
  • Darren,

    Congratulations on your selection to the Top Ten list at the September Carnival of Trust; this month hosted by Ann Bares. You can find the carnival at her site at http://compforce.typepad.com/compensation_force...

    I want to single out this post in particular, because I think it is so right and so insightful. Trust is most often examined at the micro-level, but it is powerful at a macro-level as well.

    You are completely right; contracts are a substitute for trust. By the way, this means that most legal and accounting costs are essentially the price we pay for low trust. In an uncertain world, some of that kind of thing is necessary--we incur a lot of costs for airport security in the name of an uncertain world.

    But much of it is not necessary. Why are we finding so many more disclaimers at the bottom of emails? Why is IP law exploding so much? Why are more simple transacctions being handed over to purchasing departments to be dealt with in a hands-off manner?
    In an increasingly more complex world, we forget that lowering the cost of complexity can make for a significant improvement in economic performance.

    Thanks for highlighting this important issue.
blog comments powered by Disqus